<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Between disagreement and cynicism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fullcirc.com/2009/03/11/between-disagreement-and-cynicism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fullcirc.com/2009/03/11/between-disagreement-and-cynicism/</link>
	<description>connections for a changing world, online and offline...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:42:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.fullcirc.com/2009/03/11/between-disagreement-and-cynicism/comment-page-1/#comment-8001</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fullcirc.com/wp/?p=606#comment-8001</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a tough call isn&#039;t it? For me the difference between disagreement &amp; cynicism is that cynicism ends with “it&#039;s all too hard, let&#039;s do nothing” where as disagreement says “this is wrong and this is what we need to change and here&#039;s a way we might do that”. I am a cynical person – but I&#039;m also pretty arrogant so I believe I (actually that should be “we”) can change things that probably can&#039;t be changed.

There&#039;s definitely something there about having a goal – and as an external person you can focus on that goal in way that participans (with their own day-to-day priorities and agendas) cannot.

Then allied to that is the notion of permission (which is closely related to trust). If we&#039;ve agreed on the goal and you want to get there, you have to give me permission to do all the things necessary to get you there – e.g. we give permission to personal gym trainers to push us outside our comfort zones.

Just thinkin&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a tough call isn&#8217;t it? For me the difference between disagreement &amp; cynicism is that cynicism ends with “it&#8217;s all too hard, let&#8217;s do nothing” where as disagreement says “this is wrong and this is what we need to change and here&#8217;s a way we might do that”. I am a cynical person – but I&#8217;m also pretty arrogant so I believe I (actually that should be “we”) can change things that probably can&#8217;t be changed.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s definitely something there about having a goal – and as an external person you can focus on that goal in way that participans (with their own day-to-day priorities and agendas) cannot.</p>
<p>Then allied to that is the notion of permission (which is closely related to trust). If we&#8217;ve agreed on the goal and you want to get there, you have to give me permission to do all the things necessary to get you there – e.g. we give permission to personal gym trainers to push us outside our comfort zones.</p>
<p>Just thinkin&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

