Feb 24 2010

Online Facilitation, Twitter, Backchannel and Keynotes

As promised earlier, here is my reflection of the keynote I did at the Instructional Technology Council’s annual gathering on February 22nd. The topic was “Online Facilitation: 14 years on. What have we learned and what do we need to learn.”

As usual, I decided to try something new. Why do the same old shtick – there is no learning there? So inspired by Cliff Atkinson’s book “The Back Channel,” I decided to integrate a Twitter tool into the slides and thus into the body of the talk, consciously breaking in and out of the audience. (NOTE: Update for Timo Elliot’s Twitter tools are here: http://timoelliott.com/blog/2009/10/powerpoint-twitter-tools-update-make-some-noise.html

Below I’ll share first, my reflections on the session, then links to all the session artifacts.

First: Reflection

My topic was about my past experience with online facilitation and where I thought it was headed. After a moment’s inspiration in yoga class, I realized the metaphor of the practice of yoga fit – both as a thread and a fun visual tool, which of course sent me scurrying to Flickr for creative commons photos. There was a wealth!

Cliff had graciously sent me a copy of the book, but I had not read it until last week. Perfect timing. As I read about some tools Cliff had found for integrating Twitter backchannel into a talk, I decided this was the perfect opportunity to both talk about a practice, PRACTICE the practice and do something to increase the interactivity of a keynote.

Let me stop for a second and share too, that the stakes were high. The conference started with an amazing “Late Night Learning Live” biting and sharp comedy set up by Jared Stein and Marc Hugentobler. They were brilliant. Stein has a career as a deadpan comedian, with the look and timing to match. The videos they included were rip-snorting and the commentary hit the spot. For more, see Jim Groom’s review of their session.

Then Sunday morning, the “supreme artist of  North America” (did ya see, I wrote it, Jim!) “Reverend” Jim Groom lit up the room with fabulous, concreted examples of open learning at Mary Washington University, replete with volunteer choir and “Amen’s” from the crowd. (Well, that was me. I could not resist.) So the heat was on. This was no “low expectation” moment. I even skipped the drinking and partying Sunday night to prepare. 😉

The content you can view through the artifacts below, so I’ll reflect on the Twitter backchannel experiment. To prepare, I downloaded the SAP Twitter tools from Timo Elliott and installed them. And of course, tested them. Then I used Cliff’s advice about how to frame key messages in 140 characters or less so they could easily be tweeted by the audience. To focus the backchannel, I used Timo Eliott’s autotweet tool. This means I embedded a bit of code in my slide notes pages that would generate an autotweet with that text when the slide came up. I did not autotweet on everyslide, but only on the main points. You can read the auto tweet in the PDF of the slides and notes. This practice not only helped me focus (which is difficult for me. I’m a rambler) but it also turned out to be a very effective way of creating some “retweetable” moments during the talk.  More on that later.

The next morning I arrived early – always an important speaker practice. I set up the lapt top to test the backchannel pages and THEY DIDN’T WORK. Barry Dahl, who had been my support team and encouragement, and I tried to figure it out. Finally, it dawned on me. There had been a Window’s update and then an Adobe Flash update. The slides used Flash. A quick download and all was well. Ready to start.

At the beginning of the talk, I did an in room activity to identify who knew what Twitter was (just about everyone), who had an account, who had used the account for more than two weeks and who was Tweeting live. I was inspired by a conversation with busynessgirl on Sunday to use the “stand up if…” technique. Then I did a little hand raising poll to see how people felt about the concept of integrating a back channel into a face to face presentation to surface that yes, many of us have mixed feelings. This set the tone as an experiment, not simply as a performance gimmick. Finally, I offered Cliff’s suggestion of setting the tone by asking people to “Tweet unto others as you wish to be tweeted unto.” Or something like that. 😉

To  jumpstart the Twitter stream using the #ITC10 tag, I asked both those in the room and my external community to chime in. (I had also posted to my network about an hour earlier, to “prime the pump.” )

When I brought up the first slide that showed the live twitterstream, I already had some great content to show and weave into my patter.

Then I launched into the main body of the talk, with the autotweets triggered at the start of each key section of the talk. At the end of each section, I pulled up the backchannel slide and wove in a few tweets and gave stuff away. Yeah, I gave away books and chocolate… even a bottle of wine. (Yeah, Jim, that was YOUR bottle!). I like to role model reciprocity. This helped break up the talking head effect, engage folks and it sure engaged the TweeterTable – about four fabulous folks energetically tweeting and raising their hands every time there was a giveaway. Thanks CMDuke, aka Chris Duke, ajwms, aka Audrey Williams, Dr. Donagee, Howard Beattie and others. (THANKS for your energy.)

When I finished, I wasn’t quite sure how it went. My sense is that it went really well for some people and the whole talk was a bit abstract for others. And those not on Twitter could not have had the same experience. So my guess is “mixed reactions.” I rushed at the end, mostly because I had not correctly estimated how much time I’d take setting up the experience and time on the back channel slides. I’d add more time there and less content the next time I do it. I did not get to properly debrief at the end with the room. That was a miss.

I could not WAIT to see all the tweets, so I ran up to my room, took off my shoes and read back. It was fascinating to see a) how positive it was (no snarking), that there were some very interesting side conversations between those in the room and folks out in the world, and that there was a LOT of retweeting of the key messages. Cliff Atkinson’s formula is a gem.

I started to send replies to all who tweeted, then I felt like I was generating too much traffic, so I eased off. I need to figure out how to do a proper thank you to all the people who contributed to the back channel conversation and, in my mind, raised the value of the talk. There are also tweets still coming off of the recording.

All in all – I’d do it again!

Second: Presentation Artifacts

  • The slides can be seen here and on SlideShare
  • The conference recorded my talk using Mediasite. You can find it here (requires Silverlight).
  • I set up a wiki page for resources, to embed my slides etc. I try and do this regularly, but I was doubly encouraged by Cliff’s book and Beth Kanter’s ongoing work. It is nice to see others experiencing similar patterns, reinforcing the importance of taking time to do this.
  • My audio recording  itc10NancyWhiteTalk
  • I put a lot of notes into the PPT file, so I save the HistoryofOnlineFacilitationWithNotes notes pages as a PDF.

11 responses so far

11 Responses to “Online Facilitation, Twitter, Backchannel and Keynotes”

  1. AJ Williamson 24 Feb 2010 at 3:20 pm

    Thanks Nancy for “putting yourself out there” with the twitter tools. I know I implored you on Twitter pre-ITC to do this and I am glad you did.

    The example of the golden rule of tweeting was supreme and one I will use in the future when I have the chance to try to embed Twitter into a talk or event.

    As one of the “tweeties” at the Twitter table, the talk was inspiration and engaging both on the front and the back channels.

    And thanks for sharing the materials as so much of this conference has to sink in with me for a while so having references later really makes a big difference.

  2. Nancy Whiteon 24 Feb 2010 at 3:28 pm

    You were a FABULOUS Tweetie – it is the network that makes things SING!

  3. Sarah Stewarton 24 Feb 2010 at 3:45 pm

    Hi Nancy, I just wanted to say a quick ‘thank you’ for this post for several reasons.

    Firstly, it models so beautifully how to combine blogging and reflective practice – I think this post is an excellent template for teachers. It takes courage to do this openly, especially for teachers who are not used to putting themselves and their practice out in the open environment. I know I really value this role modelling for my personal learning.

    Secondly, I really appreciate the information you have here because it will help me when I come to do similar things with the teachers and health professionals I work with.

    And lastly, I question myself at times about how I am perceived (especially by future employers and clients) when I openly reflect about my work. The process you have used here to talk about your work reassures me that what I do is a valid way of working ie if it works for Nancy then it’s good enough for me 🙂

    Thanks again, Sarah

  4. Nancy Whiteon 24 Feb 2010 at 4:08 pm

    Sarah, I continually notice how beautifully you do public reflection and I for one say BRAVA!

    And thank you so much for the kind remarks. That gave me the energy I needed to go on to my next task!

  5. Matton 24 Feb 2010 at 8:08 pm

    Nancy,

    Thanks for your great reflection and summary of the presentation. I truly enjoyed what you had to say and the backchannel conversations that stemmed because of it. I, too, was at the “tweetie table!”

  6. joitske hulseboschon 27 Feb 2010 at 1:39 am

    thansk for sharing, Nancy. It does sound like quite a bit of extra work for the facilitator/speaker to be honest!

  7. […] back to last month’s live integration of Twitter in a F2F presentation, I also realized that I could have scaffolded  the visual participation – again by reducing […]

  8. […] Nancy’s reflection on her presentation and the Twitter […]

  9. Lisa M Laneon 07 Apr 2010 at 3:56 pm

    Thank you SO much, Nancy, for posting all your resources here at your blog. I watched the Mediasite recording of your presentation today (yeah, finally!) and between drooling over chocolate bars I couldn’t have (or even tweet synchronously about) I wanted to find some of the resources. I know it takes time to keep it all together, and even share your notes! Thanks again.

  10. Nancy Whiteon 08 Apr 2010 at 4:00 pm

    It is comments like this, Lisa, that encourage me to continue the sharing practice. 😉

  11. Liz Cableon 23 May 2010 at 6:25 am

    Really useful Nancy, thanks. The feedback I get when I make my presentations interactive is phenomenal. So far I’ve just tried http://www.pollanywhere.com, as this allows people to text or tweet, and mostly my delegates are new to twitter, but I’m going to try some of your techniques.

    It is scary when the technology doesn’t work – you’ve just got to plough on!

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States.
%d bloggers like this: